Run one matter. Measure the difference.
Evaluate Exit Protocol beside your current process using one defined matter type, selected or de-identified records, and review criteria agreed before the work begins.
Compare reconstruction, trace visibility, and workpaper preparation against the way your team handles the same workflow today.
Four weeks, one workflow, clear evaluation criteria.
Select one matter type, confirm records, and define what a useful review packet must show.
Load sample or de-identified records into a controlled case workspace.
Compare trace logic, material transactions, evidence links, and report output against current process.
Document fit, gaps, buyer value, pricing, and deployment requirements.
Best-fit pilots
- High-conflict family law matters with commingled accounts and separate-property claims.
- Matters where counsel needs a user-triggered, deterministic LIBR workpaper for evaluation.
- Forensic accounting teams evaluating whether the workflow makes selected-record review clearer or more reproducible.
- Platforms seeking to add attorney-reviewable tracing without building the engine.
What you get
- User-triggered selected-document workflow on your pilot matter.
- Deterministic LIBR tracing over reviewed ledger rows with an exact-byte SHA-256 integrity reference.
- Attorney-reviewable workpaper for counsel evaluation.
- Clear notes on fit, gaps, and next steps. No legal advice. No outcome guarantee.
Turn curiosity into a validated workflow.
A good pilot measures workflow fit against agreed criteria and documents limitations, review effort, security requirements, and whether any later deployment discussion is warranted.
Evaluation path
From selected records to attorney-reviewable workpapers.
Review the synthetic demo, inspect a sample workpaper, read the methodology, then apply for a controlled pilot if the workflow fits your practice.