Run one matter. Measure the difference.
Evaluate Exit Protocol beside your current process using one defined matter type, selected or de-identified records, and review criteria agreed before the work begins.
Compare reconstruction, trace visibility, and workpaper preparation against the way your team handles the same workflow today.
Four weeks, one workflow, clear evaluation criteria.
Select one matter type, confirm records, and define what a useful review packet must show.
Load sample or de-identified records into a controlled case workspace.
Compare trace logic, material transactions, evidence links, and report output against current process.
Document fit, gaps, buyer value, pricing, and deployment requirements.
Best-fit pilots
- High-conflict family law matters with commingled accounts and separate-property claims.
- Matters where counsel needs a user-triggered, deterministic LIBR workpaper for evaluation.
- Forensic accounting teams that want to compress the first pass and focus on judgment.
- Platforms seeking to add attorney-reviewable tracing without building the engine.
What you get
- User-triggered selected-document workflow on your pilot matter.
- Deterministic LIBR tracing with full ledger and SHA-256 integrity.
- Attorney-reviewable workpaper for counsel evaluation.
- Clear notes on fit, gaps, and next steps. No legal advice. No outcome guarantee.
Turn curiosity into a validated workflow.
A good pilot proves where Exit Protocol saves review time, improves case visibility, and deserves a paid deployment or strategic buyer conversation.