Attorney Evaluation Workflow

Deterministic financial tracing for counsel and professional review.

Exit Protocol organizes selected financial records into source-linked LIBR calculations, documented assumptions, and attorney-reviewable workpapers. Counsel and qualified experts decide whether the methodology and source characterization fit the matter.

Public intake is disabled

Public file intake is currently unavailable. Do not submit client records through this page. Start with synthetic or properly de-identified records only after evaluation scope, data handling, retention, and reviewer responsibilities are documented in writing.

Exit Protocol does not provide legal advice, expert opinions, admissibility determinations, or outcome guarantees.

Deterministic LIBR The same approved ledger, source row, and ordering strategy produce the same calculation.
Source provenance Claims require an explicit eligible source transaction and retain source-document references.
Professional review Extraction candidates, assumptions, legal characterization, and final use remain reviewer decisions.
Controlled Evaluation

A review gate before every consequential step.

The current workflow is designed for scoped evaluation, not unattended processing of a firm's document estate.

01

Define the record set

Agree on selected records, jurisdictional assumptions, permitted processing paths, and responsible reviewers before transfer.

02

Review extraction candidates

Native parsing and configured OCR can propose ledger rows. No candidate becomes an authoritative transaction until explicit approval.

03

Evaluate the workpaper

Review the source link, chronology, calculation strategy, reconciliation notes, and SHA-256 output reference before relying on the result.

Scope Boundary

What the product does and does not decide.

Product output Structured ledger review, deterministic LIBR calculation, documented assumptions, source provenance, and review-ready workpapers.
Professional judgment Privilege, discovery obligations, legal characterization, jurisdictional fit, expert conclusions, admissibility, and litigation strategy.

Evaluate the workflow before using live matter data.

Review the methodology and synthetic sample first. A live-data evaluation requires a separate written scope covering access, processing providers, retention, security responsibilities, and deletion.

Discuss Evaluation Scope