For forensic accountants and litigation-support teams
Organize the record.
Start the expert work.
Turn mixed financial productions into a reviewable account-and-period inventory. Review proposed boundaries and labels, keep possible duplicates and unresolved items visible, and export reviewed documents in chronological folders with their original sources preserved.
Current production recognition uses native PDF text. Image-only pages remain unresolved in this workflow. Software proposes; professionals review and approve.
Know what you received before you start analysis.
Mixed accounts, repeated statements and supplemental deliveries make a folder of PDFs difficult to assess. Start with an inventory that lets you find a period, open its source and see what still needs attention.
01 · Review
Separate the production
Correct proposed boundaries and metadata before approving received document ranges. Original delivery files remain preserved.
02 · Organize
Find the account and period
Review institution and account labels, compare possible duplicates, and keep unresolved items visible. Coverage is measured against reviewer-defined expectations.
03 · Export
Inspect the actual files
Download approved source-page segments, originals, inventory and a manifest. Unapproved material remains in the originals rather than becoming an approved separated document.
A real export from synthetic records
See what an organization result contains.
4 PDFs and 57 pages across 2 deliveries. 17 distinct statement periods represented; 19 retained occurrences include 2 duplicate copies.
1 expected period remains outstanding, 1 statement has a recorded page gap, and 1 page remains unresolved. Represented periods are not necessarily complete documents.
Inspect the inventory and downloadsScripted synthetic reviewer actions through the application's review services. Not customer results, autonomous recognition, or a production benchmark.
Check whether your input fits.
| Input / workflow | What to expect |
|---|---|
| Native-text mixed PDFs | Reviewable document-boundary and metadata proposals for supported patterns. Human approval is required; uncertain labels remain for review. |
| Image-only production pages | Image-only production pages remain unresolved in this workflow. Manual review is needed; document organization does not run OCR. |
| Separate transaction extraction | Configured OCR may apply through the separate financial extraction path, with its own provider controls. Extracted candidates are not automatically approved ledger records. |
Unfamiliar layouts, uncertain identifiers and document families without supported patterns require review. A pilot tests the agreed sample, not every possible financial production.
Optional continuation
Continue into financial reconstruction and analysis.
Financial Record Reconstruction connects complete recorded account activity to statement controls and source pages. Reviewed Money Movement preserves reviewed transfer relationships; Money Flow Review displays those relationships without deciding their meaning. LIBR is one implemented analytical method inside the broader platform.
Analytical capabilities and boundaries
The current LIBR workpaper is single-claim, one-account and USD, with explicit inputs and assumptions. Separate conserved Value Lineage models one selected source inside one account and creates no destination TraceLot or cross-account propagation.
Money Flow does not determine source-value ancestry, ownership, purpose, concealment, fraud, or completeness. Professionals review, approve, and interpret. Software records, calculates, and proposes; it does not give legal or professional opinions.
Platform capabilities · LIBR workpaper example · Methodology
Read the attorney output brief for the specific attorney-reviewable workpaper contract. No legal advice or outcome guarantee.
The Clio selected-document workflow requires explicit user actions; it is not a partnership or endorsement claim. See the integration walkthrough and API reference.
Evidence files and selected financial fields are encrypted at rest under the documented deployment controls. See security disclosures. SHA-256 exact-file verification compares recorded bytes, not authenticity or admissibility.
Start with a synthetic walkthrough or a scoped sample.
Discuss the inventory, organized files and unresolved-items output you need. Agree scope, handling, price and schedule in writing before any real client material is transferred. Evaluation measures correction effort, unresolved items, source traceability and reviewer time.
Discuss a pilotBefore you begin
Do I need to register to inspect the example?
No. The PDFs and ZIP are public synthetic examples. The desktop sandbox launches through its simulation entry; it does not require creating your own account. Registration does not by itself grant an approved pilot or permission to transfer client files.
Can I approve or export records in the public sandbox?
No. It is a read-only demonstration of seeded review state. Use the separate downloadable organization example to inspect actual exported files, or discuss an authorized pilot workspace.
Does a gap prove something is missing from discovery?
No. An open period means a reviewer-defined expectation is not represented by the recorded documents. A missing-page observation is distinct from a missing statement. Professionals decide what to request and what the record supports.
Read published methodology notes · Open LIBR Scenario Explorer (educational only)
Evaluation path
Inspect the organized files. Then discuss your workflow.
Start with a synthetic account-and-period inventory, original source pages, duplicate review and visible unresolved items. Broader financial analysis is an optional continuation.