Selected and reviewed account records in. Deterministic single-claim LIBR replay, documented calculation settings, material PDF rows, and an exact-byte SHA-256 reference out. Built for counsel and forensic reviewers who need an inspectable calculation path.
no legal advice · no outcome guarantee · attorney and expert review required · no admissibility guarantee
Complex ledger review is easier on desktop; mobile pages stay bounded for methodology and verification checks.
Swipe horizontally to view ledger columns on tablet widths.
| Date | Description | Traceable |
|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-03 | Separate-property deposit | $100,000.00 |
| 2024-02-10 | Balance dip after withdrawal | $45,000.00 |
| + material rows in full workpaper export | ||
Deposits, withdrawals, and commingling can outpace manual reconstruction. Exit Protocol replays selected source records with documented LIBR assumptions so counsel and retained experts can review a current, inspectable workpaper path.
Transfers, loans, reimbursements, crypto exits, and entity payments blur the record long before formal discovery begins.
Disclosures, communications, and source records can contain inconsistencies that require careful comparison and professional review.
The output is not another spreadsheet. It is a structured, reviewable file built for counsel and qualified financial professionals to evaluate.
User-triggered selected-document workflow. The user selects the matter and financial document, then Exit Protocol stages extraction candidates for explicit local review. Staging performs no silent access, automatic ledger import, automatic LIBR run, source modification, or Clio upload. After separate row approval and source confirmation, the staging user may explicitly generate a local workpaper and attempt to upload a new PDF to the selected matter.
No public App Directory listing, endorsement, partnership, or certification is claimed.
Integration reviewers: see the documented, tested session-based API V1 reference at /api/ (external API keys not enabled in V1).
High-value disputes rarely fail for lack of data. They fail when the first organized, defensible picture arrives too late.
Transfers, reimbursements, crypto exits, and entity payments blur the record long before formal discovery begins.
Selected disclosures and communications provide context that must be verified against source records.
A structured workpaper can help reviewers identify assumptions, missing records, and issues that require follow-up.
Move from scattered records to a structured financial workpaper your attorney or expert can evaluate.
Upload a supported financial record you are authorized to process. PDF and image extraction stages candidate rows for approval; a validated generic transaction CSV imports directly.
Run deterministic single-claim LIBR replay on reviewed account rows with documented ordering settings, freshness checks, and an explicit claim source.
Export an attorney-reviewable workpaper with material ledger rows, documented assumptions, snapshot metadata, source provenance, and an exact-file SHA-256 reference.
Free LIBR Scenario Explorer
Use synthetic teaching scenarios or a simplified balance history to see how the Lowest Intermediate Balance Rule may constrain a claimed amount under selected assumptions.
What the explorer shows
A bounded scenario result under LIBR assumptions — not a case conclusion.
Later deposits are shown separately because treatment can be jurisdiction- and fact-dependent. This public tool does not determine legal ownership.
A structured review workflow for counsel and forensic reviewers who need deterministic tracing, documented assumptions, and source provenance before professional sign-off.
Not a dashboard screenshot. A structured attorney-reviewable workpaper with explicit methodology, selected ledger rows, source provenance, and SHA-256 integrity references.
High-conflict disputes turn on chronology: deposits, withdrawals, balance dips, and whether the replay assumptions are visible to counsel and retained experts.
Illustration only. Outcomes depend on jurisdiction, facts, and professional review—not software labels.
Teaching example: separate-property deposit, withdrawal dip, later deposit that does not restore trace under LIBR.
Jan 3 · Deposit · trace opens at $100,000
Feb 10 · Withdrawal · dip caps trace at $45,000
Mar 1 · Later deposit · account rises; trace remains $45,000
Strategy: neutral · Engine: libr-deterministic-2.0
Attorney-reviewable workpaper · not legal advice
Final file hash verification via /verify/
Core Workpaper Stages
Selected and reviewed account records in. Deterministic single-claim LIBR tracing, source provenance, material PDF rows, and exact-file verification out. Broader analysis remains outside the V1 workpaper path and requires separate professional review.
Supported PDF or image extraction creates candidate transaction rows that require explicit approval. Validated generic transaction CSV rows import directly and remain subject to user review.
An explicit source transaction and ordered, reviewed account rows produce a modeled traceable remainder under the selected calculation settings.
The PDF shows material rows, source provenance, assumptions, and snapshot metadata. The final PDF bytes receive a separate SHA-256 integrity reference.
Synthetic demo first · controlled pilot evaluation · attorney and expert review required
Review the workpaper contents, reproducibility controls, and decisions that remain with counsel or a retained forensic professional.
Evaluation path
Review the synthetic demo, inspect a sample workpaper, read the methodology, then apply for a controlled pilot if the workflow fits your practice.