How Exit Protocol Works · Part 5 of 5

Prepare the attorney-reviewable workpaper.

The V1 export path produces a single-claim LIBR workpaper with visible strategy, material ledger rows, source provenance, snapshot integrity, and a verification surface for generated exports.

Stage 05 — Prepare the Review Workpaper

Output boundary: Workpapers are structured review material for counsel and retained experts — not legal advice, not an expert report, not a court filing, and not a guarantee of admissibility or recovery.

The workpaper is where the operating model becomes a deliverable. It should let a reviewer answer: what records were selected, what tracing assumption was applied, what the ledger shows, and how to verify the exported file.

What the V1 workpaper includes

The default V1 LIBR export is intentionally narrow. One claim, one stated strategy, one workpaper surface with integrity references — so review stays focused and verification stays conservative.

Methodology

Visible LIBR strategy and scope disclosure on the workpaper face.

Ledger

Material transaction rows and summary totals that agree with the face.

Verification

Snapshot integrity and exact file-hash match for generated exports.

Export workflow

1 Confirm single-claim scope

Verify the export path matches a V1 single-claim LIBR workpaper, not a multi-claim pro-rata scenario.

2 Generate the workpaper

Produce the attorney-reviewable packet with strategy, ledger rows, and provenance references.

3 Capture snapshot integrity

Record the snapshot SHA-256 reference at export time for later inspection.

4 Verify before external use

Test the generated file with exact hash matching at /verify/.

What remains a human decision

The platform makes assumptions and calculation paths inspectable. Attorneys and retained experts still decide jurisdiction fit, factual completeness, evidentiary use, expert opinion, and litigation strategy.

Appropriate next step

Review the synthetic workpaper, read the methodology, or walk the demo sandbox before using live matter records.

Incorrect use

Treating the export as a court filing, expert report, or final legal conclusion without professional review.